European quantum technologiesSign inCreate accountContact & information
QUANTUM
EUROPE

Instrument navigator for policy makers

Decision support, not legal advice. This navigator orders options from your answers with a fixed, published rule set; it does not decide. The legal basis, the work programme, the call conditions and the Financial Regulation prevail. Check with the responsible Directorate-General, the implementing body and your legal service before choosing an instrument.

Something to do and not sure which EU instrument fits? Answer a few questions (each has "Not sure") and the navigator ranks the instruments that could do it: Horizon Europe actions and partnerships, Digital Europe, the Connecting Europe Facility, the EuroHPC and Chips Joint Undertakings, procurement procedures, pre-commercial procurement and public procurement of innovation, EIC and EIB Group finance, State aid and IPCEI, Member State-managed funds and networks. Each result says why it fits, why not, who runs it and what to read next.

Download the knowledge base (CSV) · Download the knowledge base (JSON) · Funding instruments · Who can participate? · Programme pipeline · EU legislation tracker

Questionnaire

Answer what you know; "Not sure" never counts against an instrument. Questions that do not matter for your goal are set aside.

1. What do you want to do?

The main purpose of the action. Pick the closest; the other questions refine it.

2. How should the EU act?

Funding others (grants), buying for itself or for public authorities (procurement), investing or lending, or pooling Member States and national programmes.

3. How mature is the technology?

Technology readiness levels (TRL) as in the Horizon Europe General Annexes: 1-3 basic principles to proof of concept, 4-6 validation and demonstration in a relevant environment, 7-8 prototype in an operational environment to a qualified system, 9 proven in operation.

4. Who should do the work or receive the support?

The organisations that carry out the action or are supported.

5. How many countries take part?

Where the action takes place and who must join.

6. Will national or regional money co-fund it?

Some instruments need Member State or national co-funding; others are funded by the EU budget alone.

7. What is the order of magnitude of the money involved?

Total public money for the action, EU and national together.

8. When must it start?

Instruments that need a new work programme, a Member State agreement or a Commission decision take longer than a call already planned.

9. Must the results belong to the public buyer?

In grants the beneficiaries own the results; in procurement the buyer usually owns or uses them; in pre-commercial procurement the suppliers keep the intellectual property and the buyer gets use rights.

10. Is the subject security-sensitive?

Security-sensitive: participation may be limited to EU-controlled entities (as Horizon Europe Article 22(5) and Digital Europe Article 12 allow). Defence: military use or classified information.

Start again

Security or defence goals: the defence instruments are shown in the restricted view for Commission and Member State users.

Instruments that fit your answers

Your answers
  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity
  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes

7 instruments fit, best first.

Fit with your answersHow well each instrument fits the answers given, in per cent of the weights it could earn; the best fit is highlighted.0%25%50%75%100%Chips JU pilot linesChips JU pilot lines: 100%100%IPCEIIPCEI: 100%100%Institutionalised partnership…Institutionalised partnership (JU): 79%79%Chips competence centresChips competence centres: 79%79%Co-programmed partnershipCo-programmed partnership: 58%58%Teaming for ExcellenceTeaming for Excellence: 58%58%EDIC (Digital Infrastructure…EDIC (Digital Infrastructure Consortium): 58%58%
Show the data
Fit with your answers
ItemValue (%)
Chips JU pilot lines100%
IPCEI100%
Institutionalised partnership (JU)79%
Chips competence centres79%
Co-programmed partnership58%
Teaming for Excellence58%
EDIC (Digital Infrastructure Consortium)58%

1. Chips JU pilot lines, including quantum chip pilot lines (Chips for Europe Initiative)

Strong fit: 100% · Joint Undertakings (EuroHPC, Chips) · Grant (the beneficiaries carry out and own the work)

Why this

  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity is a primary purpose.
  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes fits.
What it is for
Funding rate or co-funding
Typical size
Maturity (TRL)
The quantum chip FPAs should reach TRL 8 overall and TRL 6 under the first Specific Grant Agreement. (Funding & Tenders portal topic HORIZON-JU-Chips-FPA-QAC-1 Quantum Chip Technology for stability Pilots, Topic description)
Who owns the results
Time to grant or contract
Legal basis
Who to contact
Chips Joint Undertaking (Brussels)
Next steps
  • Pilot lines are selected through Chips JU calls with the participating states co-funding; check the Chips JU work programme.

Funding instrument record: chips-ju-quantum · Who can participate: chips-ju

Verification
Partly verified. The Chips Act articles and annex, the Chips JU amending regulation, the main multiannual work programme, two quantum FPA topic records, a Chips JU press release and one project page were read. The work-programme appendices with the call-level funding rates and the names of all six quantum pilots were not available. The digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu pages (including the EUR 65 million quantum chips news) returned HTTP 403, so the six-pilot description relies on the Chips JU press release.

All facts and sources for Chips JU pilot lines

2. Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI) - Communication 2021/C 528/02

Strong fit: 100% · State aid and IPCEI · State aid rules (national money under EU rules)

Why this

  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity is a primary purpose.
  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes fits.
What it is for
Funding rate or co-funding
Typical size
State aid approved plus expected private investment in the ten R&D&I-type integrated IPCEIs add up to over EUR 92.2 billion. (Approved integrated IPCEIs, Introductory paragraphs)
Legal basis
Who to contact
European Commission, DG COMP (IPCEI) and national IPCEI authorities via JEF-IPCEI
Next steps
  • Member States design the project together and notify it; the Commission (DG COMP) assesses it under the IPCEI Communication.
  • Start with a call for expression of interest in each Member State and the Joint European Forum for IPCEI.

Who can participate: ipcei

Verification
Verified. Read the full 2021 IPCEI Communication via the Publications Office and the DG COMP IPCEI, approved IPCEIs, Design Support Hub and JEF-IPCEI pages. The quantum status (identification phase only, 10 Member States, Q2 2026) comes from the JEF-IPCEI page.

All facts and sources for IPCEI

3. Institutionalised European Partnerships (Article 185/187 TFEU, e.g. Joint Undertakings such as EuroHPC JU and Chips JU)

Strong fit: 79% · European partnerships and Missions · Partnership or body that runs other instruments

Why this

  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity is a common use.
  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes fits.
What it is for
Funding rate or co-funding
Typical size
The Union contribution to EuroHPC JU is up to EUR 4 122 300 000, including up to EUR 1 660 000 000 from Horizon Europe, of which EUR 160 000 000 is for quantum R&I. (Council Regulation (EU) 2026/150 of 16 January 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1173 on establishing the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking, Article 1, point (4) (replacing Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1173))
Maturity (TRL)
EuroHPC quantum-pillar work programmes must include indirect R&I actions up to TRL 5 funded at 100% of eligible costs. (Council Regulation (EU) 2026/150 of 16 January 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1173 on establishing the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking, Recital (11); Article 34(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1173 as replaced)
Who owns the results
Institutionalised partnerships must give the Commission access to results and action information for developing, implementing and monitoring Union policies. (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Annex III, point 2(e))
Legal basis
Regulation (EU) 2021/695 Article 10(1)(c) and Annex III; for EuroHPC, Council Regulation (EU) 2021/1173 as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2026/150 (Article 187 TFEU). (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Article 10(1)(c); Annex III)
Who to contact
EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (quantum, HPC); Chips Joint Undertaking (semiconductors)
Next steps
  • A new Joint Undertaking or a change of mandate needs a Commission proposal and a Council regulation (Article 187 TFEU).
  • For quantum, check first what the EuroHPC and Chips Joint Undertakings already cover.

Who can participate: eurohpc-quantum · Who can participate: chips-ju

Verification
Partly verified. Article 10 and Annex III were read in full; Regulation 2026/150 was read in full text but only the quantum-relevant parts are cited. The Chips JU page was read only partly (its counters did not render), and the full Chips JU Regulation 2021/2085 was not read.

All facts and sources for Institutionalised partnership (JU)

4. Chips JU competence centres (European network of chips competence centres) and design platform

Strong fit: 79% · Joint Undertakings (EuroHPC, Chips) · Grant (the beneficiaries carry out and own the work)

Why this

  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity is a common use.
  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes fits.
What it is for
Funding rate or co-funding
EU budgets for the Initiative calls are matched by commensurate national contributions, unless marked as 100 % EU funded. (Chips JU Multiannual Work Programme 2023-2027, Version 20.0 (main document; appendices are separate), Section 2.1, note under the budget table)
Typical size
Time to grant or contract
DIGITAL-Chips-2024-SG-CCC-1 opened on 4 July 2024 and closed on 2 October 2024. (Funding & Tenders portal topic DIGITAL-Chips-2024-SG-CCC-1 Competence Centers, Topic actions, opening and deadline dates)
Legal basis
Regulation (EU) 2023/1781, Article 11 (European network of competence centres) and Article 5(a) / Annex I Part I (design platform), and Article 12 (implementation by the Chips JU). (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781 establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe's semiconductor ecosystem (Chips Act), Articles 5, 11, 12; Annex I Parts I and IV)
Who to contact
Chips Joint Undertaking, via the national competence centre designated by each Member State
Next steps
  • Each competence centre is designated by its Member State and co-funded through the Chips JU.

Who can participate: chips-ju

Verification
Partly verified. The Chips Act Article 11 and annexes, the 2024 competence-centre topic record and the main Chips JU work programme were read. The number of selected centres, their funding rate and the Commission news on the competence centres (digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu, HTTP 403) could not be read, and the Chips JU competence-centre page returned 'Page Not Found'. No quantum-specific competence-centre example was found on an official page.

All facts and sources for Chips competence centres

5. Co-programmed European Partnerships

Good fit: 58% · European partnerships and Missions · Partnership or body that runs other instruments

Why this

  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes fits.

Watch out

  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity is possible, but not its main use. It is mainly for: Coordinate, network, align programmes or standards; Research: new knowledge, early-stage science; Innovation: develop, test or demonstrate a technology.
What it is for
Co-programmed partnerships rest on memoranda of understanding or contractual arrangements between the Commission and partners, setting objectives, financial and in-kind commitments, KPIs, results and reporting, and identifying complementary R&I activities by partners and the programme. (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Article 10(1)(a))
Funding rate or co-funding
Funding follows the action type of each topic (for example 100% RIA, 70% IA). (Horizon Europe Work Programme 2026-2027, Part 15: General Annexes, General Annex G, p. 31)
Who owns the results
Projects funded through partnership topics follow standard Horizon Europe ownership rules: beneficiaries own their results. (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Article 38(1))
Legal basis
Regulation (EU) 2021/695, Article 10(1)(a), 10(2)-(4) and Annex III. (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Article 10; Annex III)
Who to contact
DG Research and Innovation (partnership portfolio); ERA-LEARN support platform
Next steps
  • An industry association signs a memorandum of understanding with the Commission; calls then run in the Horizon Europe work programme.
  • Raise it in the strategic planning for the next programme period.
Verification
Partly verified. Rules were read in the Regulation and Decision; the partnership list came from the DG RTD page. Individual MoUs were not read, and no quantum co-programmed partnership exists in the list read.

All facts and sources for Co-programmed partnership

6. Teaming for Excellence (and the 2026 Teaming Synergies action)

Good fit: 58% · Horizon Europe: researchers, excellence and widening · Grant (the beneficiaries carry out and own the work)

Why this

  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes fits.

Watch out

  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity is possible, but not its main use. It is mainly for: Skills and talent: train or attract people; Research: new knowledge, early-stage science; Deploy infrastructure (computers, networks, testbeds, facilities).
What it is for
Funding rate or co-funding
Typical size
Who owns the results
Beneficiaries own the results they generate. (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Article 38(1))
Time to grant or contract
Horizon Europe maxima: 5 months to inform applicants and 8 months to sign grant agreements. (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Article 31(1))
Legal basis
Teaming is an area of intervention under 'widening participation and spreading excellence', funded from the EUR 2 842 000 000 envelope. (Regulation (EU) 2021/695 establishing Horizon Europe, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, Annex I Part 'Widening Participation and Strengthening the ERA'; Article 12(2)(d))
Who to contact
European Research Executive Agency (REA), Widening participation and spreading excellence
Next steps
  • Pair an institution in a widening country with a leading advanced partner to create or upgrade a centre of excellence.
  • The national or regional authority commits complementary funding.

Who can participate: horizon-europe

Verification
Partly verified. I read the Teaming 2025 topic in the Widening Work Programme 2023-2025 and the Teaming Synergies 2026 topic in the 2026-2027 work programme. The 2026-2027 table of contents lists no new Teaming for Excellence call. REA's role is inferred from its general Widening listing.

All facts and sources for Teaming for Excellence

7. European Digital Infrastructure Consortium (EDIC)

Good fit: 58% · Digital Europe Programme · Partnership or body that runs other instruments

Why this

  • How the EU acts: Pool or align Member States and national programmes fits.

Watch out

  • Goal: Build industrial or manufacturing capacity is possible, but not its main use. It is mainly for: Deploy infrastructure (computers, networks, testbeds, facilities); Coordinate, network, align programmes or standards.
What it is for
Who owns the results
An EDIC can acquire, own and dispose of property, including intellectual property; its statutes must set rules on ownership of infrastructure, IP, profits and other assets. (Decision (EU) 2022/2481 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030, Articles 13(4), 17(1)(h))
Legal basis
Decision (EU) 2022/2481 (Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030), Articles 13-21 on EDICs. (Decision (EU) 2022/2481 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030, Articles 13-21)
Who to contact
European Commission, DG CNECT
Next steps
  • At least three Member States apply to the Commission; the EDIC is set up by a Commission implementing decision after the Digital Decade committee.
  • Draft the statutes, the multi-country project and the contributions.
Verification
Partly verified. Decision 2022/2481 was read in full via the Publications Office. No quantum-related EDIC proposal or decision was found on an official page I could read, and the Quantum Europe Strategy (COM(2025) 363) does not mention EDICs. The Commission EDIC page was blocked (403), so the current list of EDICs was not checked.

All facts and sources for EDIC (Digital Infrastructure Consortium)

Compare the top results side by side

Why not the others: 41 instruments ruled out

Compare instruments

Tick two to four instruments; the first four ticked are compared.

Horizon Europe: collaborative actions
Horizon Europe: researchers, excellence and widening
European Innovation Council
European partnerships and Missions
Digital Europe Programme
Connecting Europe Facility (Digital)
Joint Undertakings (EuroHPC, Chips)
Procurement procedures (Financial Regulation)
Innovation procurement (PCP and PPI)
Finance: equity, loans and guarantees
State aid and IPCEI
Funds managed by the Member States
Networks and national partnerships

Decision tree

What you want to do, then how the EU acts, then the instruments the rules rank first from those two answers alone. The full questionnaire refines the order. Each branch opens the questionnaire with those two answers.

Worked examples

  • Install a quantum computer for European users

    A Member State and its national supercomputing centre want a quantum computer coupled to a supercomputer, open to European users, owned by the public side.

    The rules rank first: EuroHPC JU quantum computer procurement; Competitive dialogue

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • QKD testbeds and links across Member States

    Several Member States want national quantum communication infrastructures connected across borders as part of EuroQCI.

    The rules rank first: EuroQCI national projects (DEP); CEF Digital (EuroQCI links)

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • A public need no product meets yet

    Public authorities need a quantum-safe sensing or timing service that does not exist yet; they want suppliers to develop and test competing solutions.

    The rules rank first: Pre-commercial procurement (PCP); Innovation partnership

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • Scale up a quantum start-up

    A European quantum hardware start-up with a working prototype needs money to grow and reach the market.

    The rules rank first: EIC Accelerator; EIC Fund (equity)

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • A pilot line for quantum chips

    Research and technology organisations from several Member States want a shared pilot line to fabricate and test quantum chips, with national co-funding.

    The rules rank first: Chips JU pilot lines; IPCEI

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • Attract and train quantum researchers

    A ministry wants more top quantum researchers and doctoral candidates in its universities.

    The rules rank first: Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; ERA Chairs

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • Align national quantum research programmes

    National funders of several countries want joint calls for quantum research, each funding its own teams.

    The rules rank first: Programme co-fund (co-funded partnership); QuantERA

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • Collaborative research on quantum sensing

    Universities and companies from several countries want to advance quantum sensors from proof of concept to lab validation.

    The rules rank first: Horizon Europe RIA; EuroHPC JU quantum grants

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • Support standardisation and a community roadmap

    The Commission wants European stakeholders to coordinate their input to quantum standards and update a strategic roadmap.

    The rules rank first: Horizon Europe CSA; COST Action

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • A first industrial deployment across Member States

    Several Member States want to support companies in a large first industrial deployment of quantum technologies, beyond what the market would fund.

    The rules rank first: IPCEI; Chips JU pilot lines

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • Buy an existing service

    A Commission service needs a study or an off-the-shelf service on post-quantum migration, available on the market today.

    The rules rank first: Open procedure; Restricted procedure

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • Network researchers across Europe and beyond

    Researchers want a pan-European network with partners outside the EU for meetings, training schools and short visits.

    The rules rank first: COST Action; Horizon Europe CSA

    Open this example in the questionnaire

  • A regional quantum programme

    A region wants to fund quantum testbeds and company projects from its regional development programme.

    The rules rank first: Cohesion policy funds (ERDF); Teaming for Excellence

    Open this example in the questionnaire

All instruments

Open an instrument for all its facts, sources, contact and next steps. The CSV and JSON downloads hold the whole knowledge base.

Horizon Europe: collaborative actions

Horizon Europe: researchers, excellence and widening

European Innovation Council

European partnerships and Missions

Digital Europe Programme

Connecting Europe Facility (Digital)

Joint Undertakings (EuroHPC, Chips)

Procurement procedures (Financial Regulation)

Innovation procurement (PCP and PPI)

Finance: equity, loans and guarantees

State aid and IPCEI

Funds managed by the Member States

Networks and national partnerships

How the navigator decides

Each answer you give (not "Not sure", and not a question set aside for your goal) is compared with the fit profile of every instrument. An instrument earns the question's weight when your answer is one of the options its profile lists; for the goal it earns the weight times the level its profile gives that goal (3 a primary purpose, 2 a common use, 1 possible but not its main use, 0 not for this). The score is the share of the weights it earned among those it could earn, in per cent; a question its profile leaves empty does not matter for it and counts neither way. A mismatch on a blocking question (the goal at level 0, how the EU acts, who must own the results, sensitivity) rules the instrument out and the reason is shown. Ties go to the higher goal level, then to the order of the knowledge base. Results at 75% or more are a strong fit, at 55% or more a good fit, from 40% a possible fit; at most eight are shown. The decision tree uses the same rules with the goal and the role answers alone. Nothing is learned from use and no AI is involved.

Weights of the questions
QuestionWeightA mismatch rules the instrument out
Goal30Yes
How the EU acts18Yes
Maturity12No
Who acts10No
Countries8No
National co-funding6No
Budget6No
Timeframe5No
Ownership of results10Yes
Sensitivity8Yes

48 instruments, 165 official sources; compiled 2026-10-25, assembled 2026-11-02; reviewed every 180 days, since work programmes change.

Knowledge base of EU instruments for the instrument navigator, compiled from official sources (EUR-Lex read through the Publications Office where EUR-Lex refused automated reading, the Funding & Tenders Portal, work programmes, Commission, agency and Joint Undertaking pages, CORDIS) on the dates shown with each source. Each fact is written in the portal's own words with its source and locator; figures appear only where the source states them. A record marked partly verified has at least one fact read on a summary page or a key page that could not be read. The fit profiles and weights are the portal's editorial rule set, documented in docs/modules/instrument-navigator.md, not official guidance.

Official pages that could not be read when compiled
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021R0695: HTTP 202 with empty body (EUR-Lex bot challenge); read via Publications Office (2026-10-25)
  • https://erc.europa.eu/apply-grant/starting-grant: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://erc.europa.eu/apply-grant/proof-concept: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/wp-call/2026-2027/wp-2-msca-actions_horizon-2026-2027_en.pdf: HTTP 404 (wrong filename; correct file read instead) (2026-10-25)
  • https://eic.ec.europa.eu/investment-opportunities/eic-fund_en: HTTP 404 (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/activities/work-programmes-digital: HTTP 403 (curl, WebFetch and browser pane) (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/work-programme-2025-2027-digital-europe-programme-digital: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/amendment-digital-europe-programme-and-work-programme-2025-2027: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021R0694: HTTP 202 with empty body; read via Publications Office instead (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/edic: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32022D2481: HTTP 202 with empty body; read via Publications Office (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-quantum-communication-infrastructure-euroqci: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021R1153: HTTP 202 with empty body; read via Publications Office (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021R1173: HTTP 202 with empty body (bot challenge); read via Publications Office instead (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/eu-invests-eu65-million-quantum-chips: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/factpages/european-chips-act-chips-europe-initiative: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/chips-competence-centres-strengthen-semiconductor-expertise-across-europe-about-kick: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://www.chips-ju.europa.eu/CompCentres/: Page Not Found (2026-10-25)
  • https://aar2024.chips-ju.europa.eu/annual-report/competence-centres: HTTP 404 (2026-10-25)
  • https://www.cost.eu/funding/how-to-get-funding/: HTTP 404 (2026-10-25)
  • https://eurekanetwork.org/programmes-and-calls/eurostars/: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://eurekanetwork.org/programmes-and-calls/network-projects/: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32024R2509: AWS WAF challenge / empty content; read via Publications Office instead (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0024: AWS WAF challenge; read via Publications Office instead (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/pre-commercial-procurement: HTTP 403 (WebFetch, curl and browser) (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021XC0706(02): EUR-Lex empty / WAF; the guidance was read from the Commission docsroom PDF (2026-10-25)
  • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/public-procurement-innovative-solutions: HTTP 403 (WebFetch, curl and browser) (2026-10-25)
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R0697: Empty response (HTTP 202, 0 bytes); acts read via Publications Office instead (2026-10-25)
  • https://www.eib.org/en/products/equity/venture-debt/index: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare block) via curl, WebFetch and browser (2026-10-25)
  • https://www.eib.org/en/press/all/2022-207-finland-iqm-s-quantum-fabrication-facility-gets-a-eur35-million-boost-from-the-eib: HTTP 403 (Cloudflare block) (2026-10-25)
  • https://www.eif.org/etci/index.htm: HTTP 403 (2026-10-25)
  • https://www.eif.org/what_we_do/equity/escalar/index.htm: HTTP 403 (curl and WebFetch) (2026-10-25)
  • https://kohesio.ec.europa.eu/en/projects?keywords=quantum%20computer: HTTP 403 (curl and browser) (2026-10-25)
  • https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en: Redirects to a language-selection page; content read at reforms-investments.ec.europa.eu instead (2026-10-25)
  • https://eda.europa.eu/what-we-do/eu-defence-initiatives/projects: HTTP 404 (2026-10-25)

Contact & information · Privacy and cookies · Legal notice · Terms of use · Accessibility

Image credits · All tools and pages