Skip to main content

KPI observatory

The key performance indicators that the Strategic Advisory Board of the Quantum Flagship uses to follow quantum technologies in Europe: 25 indicators in six areas, some with parts, from 2021 to 2024 against the targets for 2030.

Each card shows the official 2024 value and the 2030 target as published, the trajectory this portal calculates from the official values, and a live measure from the data of the portal where one exists. Live measures are proxies with their own method and coverage; they never replace the official values.

Source: Key Performance Indicators for Quantum Technologies in Europe (Quantum Flagship Strategic Advisory Board, March 2025). The 2024 values were measured in early 2025 through surveys of SAB, QCB, QuIC and QUCATS members and verified and validated by the SAB (booklet page 2).

Live measures assembled on 2026-11-02 from the stored data of the portal. Pilot, pending editorial review.

Download all indicators as JSON · Download all indicators as CSV · How the trajectory is calculated

The six areas are those of the KPI booklet, kept as published. The portal’s own technology pillars follow the draft SRIA 2026: Quantum Computing and Quantum Simulation below are the two parts of its computing and simulation pillar, and enabling technologies and the supply chain have no area of their own in the booklet. Why the portal uses four pillars

Goals and KPIs proposed in the draft SRIA 2026

At a glance

9 of 22 assessed indicators are on pace or have reached their 2030 target.

  • 1 Target reached
  • 8 On pace
  • 4 On pace only if growth compounds
  • 9 Slower than needed
  • 8 Not assessed

30 indicators and parts in total; 16 with a live measure of the portal. Status by the first measure of each indicator, calculated by this portal from the official values, not the colours of the booklet.

Definitions: Indicators by trajectory status; Trajectory towards the 2030 target

Quantum Simulation

  • Sim 1

    Performance

    2024, official
    0
    2030 target
    8
    0% of the 2030 target
    Values as a table Sim 1
    Official values of Sim 1 as published by the SAB
    YearValue
    20210
    20220
    20230
    20240

    Slower than needed Recent pace +0.0 a year; needed +1.3 a year to 2030.

    Live measure

    No automatic measure. Quantum advantage needs benchmark results the portal does not hold.

    Details, method and sources Sim 1

  • Sim 2

    Increase market adoption: applications

    2024, official
    0
    2030 target
    12
    0% of the 2030 target
    Values as a table Sim 2
    Official values of Sim 2 as published by the SAB
    YearValue
    20210
    20220
    20230
    20240

    Slower than needed Recent pace +0.0 a year; needed +2.0 a year to 2030.

    Live measure

    No automatic measure. Products introduced on the basis of quantum simulation are not recorded by any source of the portal.

    Details, method and sources Sim 2

  • Sim 3

    Performance: available simulators

    2024, official
    4
    2030 target
    n/a* (under review)

    Not assessed The 2030 target is not set or under review.

    Live measure (portal proxy, not the official value)

    Quantum simulators in the infrastructure catalogue

    2 simulators Quantum simulators inaugurated or in operation

    How it is calculated

    Quantum simulators of the infrastructure catalogue that are inaugurated or in operation, with those planned shown apart.

    Coverage: The source-verified infrastructure catalogue.

    • Availability is not quantum advantage: the SAB counts simulators giving results classical computers cannot obtain.
    • The catalogue has no history, so there is no yearly series.

    Data as of 2026-10-27.

    Definition: Sim 3 live measure: quantum simulators in operation

    Details, method and sources Sim 3

  • Sim 4

    Increase market adoption: use cases

    2024, official
    1
    2030 target
    n/a* (under review)

    Not assessed The 2030 target is not set or under review.

    Live measure (portal proxy, not the official value)

    Documented quantum simulation use cases

    1 use cases Documented quantum simulation use cases

    How it is calculated

    Use cases of the adoption directory classified as quantum simulation, counted cumulatively by the year of their source.

    Coverage: The source-verified use cases of the adoption directory.

    • A curated selection; a documented case need not run on an EU quantum simulator.

    Data as of 2026-10-21.

    Definition: Sim 4 live measure: documented quantum simulation use cases

    Details, method and sources Sim 4

  • Sim 5

    European technical leadership

    2024, official
    100
    2030 target
    5000
    2% of the 2030 target
    Values as a table Sim 5
    Official values of Sim 5 as published by the SAB
    YearValue
    2021-
    2022100
    2023100
    2024100

    Slower than needed Recent pace +0.0 a year; needed +816.7 a year to 2030.

    Live measure

    No automatic measure. Qubit or particle counts of simulators are not recorded by the catalogue or the tracker.

    Details, method and sources Sim 5

Definitions: Official KPI values and 2030 targets; Progress towards the 2030 target; Trajectory towards the 2030 target

How the trajectory is calculated

  • Recent pace: the yearly change from the first to the last numeric official value, (last - first) / years between them.
  • When the official values rise and fall (for example Eco 1: 344, 408, 551 and 344), the first and last values alone would hide the movement between them, so the recent pace is the least-squares slope of all numeric values (a straight line fitted through them), and the compound rate comes from the same fit on their logarithms. The formula of each indicator says which method was used.
  • Needed pace: (2030 target - last value) / years left until 2030.
  • On pace when the recent pace is at least the needed pace; target reached when the last value already meets the target; on pace only if growth compounds when the yearly growth rate of the same years, kept until 2030, would reach the target although the linear pace would not; slower than needed otherwise.
  • Not assessed: ranks, descriptions, indicators with fewer than two numeric values, and targets under review.
  • Progress bars appear only where the value and the target share a unit.

The booklet marks each indicator with one of these four colours (page 4). The colours are not reproduced here; the booklet itself shows them. Some 2030 targets are still under discussion and shown as n/a; the targets of Communication 2b, Computing 2 and Simulation 3 and 4 are under review (booklet pages 3 and 20).

Use the print command of your browser to keep this scorecard as a PDF.